I don't know if any of this will make sense to anyone. I have been thinking about writing this since the flood occurred. The damage sustained in the park this time is significant, but we will recover and we will be open for business next spring. The store will be brighter and fresh and new. The bathrooms will be new and beautiful to see. Some things we don't know about...the Lil Red Caboose - we have to wait until spring to see the total damage done - what is working and what is not. The pool - again we can't tell what the damage under the cover is. Will the pool heater work? We wait.
I will say that neither Sandy nor I are quitters and while it is going to be tough, we will come out in the end.
We own and operate West Canada Creek Campsites, located on
the West Canada Creek just west of the village of Poland on State Route
28. My family purchased this property in
February of 2005. We have owned and
operated this campground for 15 years.
Prior to our ownership, the park was owned by two other
individuals beginning in 1982. In that
time until 2006, no one experienced flooding on the scale we have seen. In fact, when doing my due diligence and
researching this property for flooding issues – the last major flood was
1947. There were minor flooding issues,
but the river never did the damage nor rose to the levels we have seen in the
years we have owned the park.
This most recent flood event was a serious wake up call to
all who live along the West Canada.
Prior flood events above the bridge on Route 28 in Poland we exacerbated
by the low old bridge. The bridge was
replaced in 2016 (check date) and the engineers that met at our public meetings
told us the water would never touch the new bridge. Silly statement indeed. In addition to raising the bridge approximate
8 feet, the project also widened the river by over 50 feet which allowed
significantly more water through.
So why
did we flood so badly on the days following Halloween 2019?
Many people will say that the flooding was caused by the
significant rainfall the occurred on the 30th and 31st. While many in our community experienced
significant damage from the onslaught of rain that occurred and many road ways
and some bridges that were washed out as well as several significant landslides
that occurred along State Route 28 just west of West Canada Valley Central
School, the catastrophic damage that was done along the West Canada Creek might
have been reduced had those operating the dam at Hinckley Reservoir paid heed
to the projected rainfall and lowered the dam during the 10 days prior to
Halloween, instead of waiting until October 29th to try and lower the
water level.
The chart to the left from the USGS website shows that the
rainfall that occurred on October 14 – 16 raised the water level in Hinckley
Reservoir over 10 feet. The amount of
rainfall during this event was in the range of 2.5 – 3.5 inches of rain.
From October 19 through October 29 (Chart on next page) there was no attempt made to lower the reservoir and the water level stayed at the top of the spillway (the green line on the chart) for the ensuing 10 days. This failure to lower the reservoir was disastrous to those living and working along the West Canada Creek. The release schedule seen in the next chart shows that there was no attempt to lower the reservoir – even though the National Weather Service was calling for significant rain on Halloween from a Tropical Depression moving from the Gulf of Mexico up the Mississippi River Valley, through the Ohio River Valley into the Adirondack Region.
The above chart taken from the website (http://www.canals.ny.gov/wwwapps/waterlevels/hinckley/hinckleywaterlevels.aspx)
shows that the release from Hinckley Reservoir on October 17th
was 891 CFS and until October 28th the release was not increased
significantly even though the threat for a significant rainfall was predicted.
The chart left shows what the water levels in Hinckley
Reservoir were from October 4th through November 10th.
![]() |
| Add caption |
The chart above shows
the river gauge on the West Canada Creek at Wilmurt during the event. Wilmurt is above Hinckley Reservoir and this
gauge shows the inflow. Note that the stream
gauge stopped working for a period of time due to the extreme high level of
water and possibly debris floating that caused failure. It stopped working when the water level was
at approximately 19,000 CFS
This chart shows the inflows from the Black Creek to
Hinckley Reservoir. Black Creek maxed
out at about 7000 CFS on November 1st, 2019.
What does this all mean?
To understand this let try to understand the numbers. One Cubic Foot of Water (CF) is equal to 7.48
gallons. I will use 7.5 to keep the math
easier. One acre of water, one foot deep
is equal to 325,851 gallons. The surface
area of Hinckley Reservoir is approximately 2,867 square acres. As the water level decreases the number of
acres decreases as the width decreases due to the sloped shoreline. I will concede a 3% reduction in surface area
for every foot of decrease in the reservoir water level.
Factor
|
Water Elevation
|
Surface Area
|
Gallons/Acre
|
Total Gallons
|
Accume Total
|
1
|
1224
|
2867.00
|
325851
|
934,214,817
|
|
0.97
|
1223
|
2780.99
|
325851
|
906,188,372
|
1,840,403,189
|
0.94
|
1222
|
2694.98
|
325851
|
878,161,928
|
2,718,565,117
|
0.91
|
1221
|
2608.97
|
325851
|
850,135,483
|
3,568,700,601
|
0.88
|
1220
|
2522.96
|
325851
|
822,109,039
|
4,390,809,640
|
0.85
|
1219
|
2436.95
|
325851
|
794,082,594
|
5,184,892,234
|
0.82
|
1218
|
2350.94
|
325851
|
766,056,150
|
5,950,948,384
|
0.79
|
1217
|
2264.93
|
325851
|
738,029,705
|
6,688,978,090
|
0.76
|
1216
|
2178.92
|
325851
|
710,003,261
|
7,398,981,351
|
0.73
|
1215
|
2092.91
|
325851
|
681,976,816
|
8,080,958,167
|
0.7
|
1214
|
2006.90
|
325851
|
653,950,372
|
8,734,908,539
|
0.67
|
1213
|
1920.89
|
325851
|
625,923,927
|
9,360,832,466
|
Cubic Feet per Second (CFS) is equal to a cubic foot of
water passing a given point every second.
At the height of the event the West Canada Creek had in excess of 19,000
CFS flowing into Hinckley Reservoir and the Black Creek had in excess of 7,000
CFS flowing into Hinckley Reservoir.
These numbers equaled a combined inflow 729,000,000 or almost 730 million
gallons per hour flowing into Hinckley Reservoir. Had the powers that be lowered Hinckley
Reservoir 10 or 11 feet prior to the storm, the reservoir would have been able
to absorb approximately 9 billion gallons before it began to overflow instead
of the 900 million gallons at the level of 1223 would allow. And while I will grant you that we still
would have flooded, the timing might have been changed to later in the day
allowing more people to prepare, instead of water coming up 9 inches every 30
minutes at 7:30 a.m. when we were forced to abandon our property to the mercy
of the river.
With the inflow of 729 million and the outflow at max of 97
million gallons per hour the reservoir would have still hit flood stage, but
later in the day and not as severe.
I would also like to ask the really important question of
why did Hinckley Reservoir NEVER turn on their Emergency Contact Process? In other flood events, the local fire
departments were notified of impending flooding and were more prepared to
notify and evacuate people. In 2011 and
2014 the Oneida County Emergency Management team notified us ahead of time and
even provided sand bags to help mitigate flood damage. Prior to the Halloween storm there was NO
notifications made.
Assemblyman Mark Butler came to our property during his term
24 – 26 hours ahead of prior flood events to notify me to prepare for the flooding. Communication was made and people were able
to prepare and evacuate safely, this time, people in the community were given
NO WARNING. Senior citizens were awoken
in the early morning hours and evacuated with a front loader carrying them
through the rising waters as the boats were too slow. Many were unable to pack anything other than
the clothing they wore and their cars were left to the mercy of the
waters.
We seem to be flooding about every 5 years on average since
2006. The people in control of the reservoir
seem to be less responsible and less knowledgeable on how to control the dam
and minimize the damage to downstream residents. What is the answer? I am not a hydrologist, meteorologist or
expert in water control, but something needs to be done. While not the only solution to the problem,
but the one factor that no one will talk about is the removal of the Gray
Reservoir. It was removed in 2002 (check
date) and since its removal we have had 4 floods. I am told by the “old timers” that many years
ago the canal corporation used to send people into the woods to measure the
snow pack then they would lower the reservoir accordingly preparing for the
spring runoff. Do they still do
this??
It seems to me that flooding is becoming a way of life, and
frankly, this last storm will cost me well over $150,000 or more and will make
it that much harder to prepare for the next flood.
Recent Crests
(1) 1,231.49 ft on 11/01/2019 (P)
(2) 1,228.05 ft on 04/21/2019 (P)
(3) 1,227.13 ft on 04/12/2017
(4) 1,227.06 ft on 04/22/2015 (P)
(5) 1,229.05 ft on 04/16/2014
(6) 1,228.02 ft on 07/03/2013
(7) 1,227.23 ft on 06/29/2013
(8) 1,227.49 ft on 04/20/2013
(9) 1,230.73 ft on 04/28/2011
(10) 1,227.18 ft on 04/14/2011
(11) 1,229.85 ft on 06/29/2006
(12) 1,227.22 ft on 04/25/2005
(1) 1,231.49 ft on 11/01/2019 (P)
(2) 1,228.05 ft on 04/21/2019 (P)
(3) 1,227.13 ft on 04/12/2017
(4) 1,227.06 ft on 04/22/2015 (P)
(5) 1,229.05 ft on 04/16/2014
(6) 1,228.02 ft on 07/03/2013
(7) 1,227.23 ft on 06/29/2013
(8) 1,227.49 ft on 04/20/2013
(9) 1,230.73 ft on 04/28/2011
(10) 1,227.18 ft on 04/14/2011
(11) 1,229.85 ft on 06/29/2006
(12) 1,227.22 ft on 04/25/2005
Purchased Park
(13) 1,228.15 ft on 05/25/2004
(14) 1,227.90 ft on 04/25/2001
(15) 1,227.30 ft on 12/03/1996
(16) 1,227.20 ft on 04/24/1996
(17) 1,227.20 ft on 10/22/1995
(18) 1,223.40 ft on 01/22/1995
(19) 1,227.80 ft on 04/26/1994
(20) 1,228.40 ft on 04/17/1993
(21) 1,226.90 ft on 04/24/1992
(22) 1,227.40 ft on 12/31/1990
(23) 1,227.90 ft on 03/18/1990
(24) 1,227.60 ft on 04/07/1989
(25) 1,226.20 ft on 04/08/1988
(26) 1,228.70 ft on 04/28/1980
(27) 1,228.00 ft on 12/28/1973
(28) 1,227.90 ft on 05/19/1973
(29) 1,228.70 ft on 05/04/1972
(30) 1,227.50 ft on 04/29/1970
(31) 1,227.90 ft on 04/20/1969
(32) 1,230.20 ft on 10/02/1945 Last Major Flood Prior to 2005
(P): Preliminary values subject to further review.




